Jennifer Delaney is a professor of higher education in the department of education policy, organization and leadership at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She has co-written studies that examine the impact of direct college admissions – where all students who attain certain high school GPAs are automatically admitted. Delaney spoke with News Bureau education editor Sharita Forrest about this trend and the implications for equity and diversity.
How many colleges and universities in the U.S. so far are utilizing or test-driving direct admissions?
We have seen growth in the use of direct admissions from institutions and states and through some companies. There are a number of states operating direct admissions programs, such as Idaho, Hawaii, and Minnesota. Some states, like Connecticut, are in the process of designing systems, while South Dakota had a proactive admissions system but suspended its use during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The private, non-profit Common App has run direct admissions pilot programs since 2019. In the 2022-23 academic year, 14 universities participated in the Common App program, and they offered direct admissions spots to 30,000 students. There are also some for-profit companies moving into this space like Greenlight Match; Concourse, which is owned by EAB; and Niche.
How do these systems affect enrollment patterns at colleges and universities?
Direct admissions are advantageous for colleges and universities. In our research in Idaho, we found increases in first-time undergraduate enrollment of 4-8%, ranging from 53-104 students per campus, following the introduction of the policy.
Most of these gains were concentrated in open-access institutions. In addition, students were more likely to remain in-state for college under a direct admissions system, with our research showing a 4-8% increase in in-state students, about 80-143 students per campus. While these overall effects are promising, we did not find impacts for low-income students in Idaho, likely because their direct admissions system only offers admissions and does not incorporate student financial aid.
Do you foresee this as something that will become universal, including elite institutions?
It is not clear that the “traditional” college admissions process is needed today. The idea that we ask each student to search for colleges then to fill out individual, customized applications seem outdated at a time where there are state longitudinal data systems that already collect most of the information that is asked for on college applications.
We also know that there are inequities in the current college admissions process such that those students who have more social and cultural capital are more likely to engage in the process and to attend college. The administrative and bureaucratic barriers present in traditional college admissions systems are unnecessary barriers. They deflect students from attending college, even when they would benefit from pursuing a college degree.
Removing these barriers is likely to be most impactful for vulnerable student populations such as those who are low-income, first generation, rural, foster youth and from minoritized backgrounds. Removing these barriers should produce additional equity and equality of opportunity.
We have found more resistance to the idea of direct admissions with elite institutions that use selective admissions processes, but it is not impossible for these institutions to also benefit from streamlining their admissions process and using existing data to simplify the college application process. In fact, the flagship institution in Idaho, the University of Idaho, was the champion of the direct admissions program in that state, so some elite institutions see the benefits of direct admissions, especially in their ability to increase student diversity on campuses.
Some schools are suspending the use of test scores such as the SAT and ACT. Is this likely to help or hinder the expansion of direct admissions?
Test optional policies are another contemporary trend in college admissions. However, because these policies only concentrate on the use of standardized tests scores, not all direct admissions systems will be impacted. Many direct admissions systems use only high school GPA for purposes of admissions and have never considered standardized test scores.
Others use standardized tests in addition to high school GPA, but most of those systems were tested during the pandemic when access to standardized testing dropped drastically. Those systems typically shifted to using only high school GPA for purposes of their admissions thresholds and were able to continue functioning with little disruption. Overall, it seems unlikely that the expansion of test optional policies will have a large impact on direct admissions policies.